Penetration Tester - Hardware (Canada)
PacketlabsLocation: Remote (Canada)Open for: 11 days
- Workplace: Remote
- $90k to $140k a year CAD
Checking today's postings…
PacketlabsLocation: Remote (Canada)Open for: 11 days
Open 11 days
Reposted
Ghostless has seen this role posted 2 times, taken down and put back up under a new listing.
Ghostless records the day it first sees a posting, so a repost can't reset its age.
Last checked Nov 1, 2026.
See how much of this posting your resume shows, and what it's missing.
Upload your resumeNot stated: Real vacancy, AI screening.
Ontario requires postings from employers with 25 or more staff to state the pay, whether the vacancy exists, and whether AI screens applicants.
Packetlabs is a cybersecurity consulting firm specializing in advanced Penetration Testing. We exist to eliminate the false sense of security that comes from shallow testing and checkbox-driven assessments. Our slogan, "Ready for more than a VA scan?", reflects a simple standard: real security work should be rigorous, manual, and built to uncover what automated approaches miss. Our clients span government, technology, law enforcement, retail, healthcare, and financial services, and they rely on us because credibility matters when the stakes are high.
Packetlabs is looking for an Penetration Tester - Hardware to lead security assessments of embedded and IoT devices, the physical products where a vulnerability lives in silicon, firmware, and board layout, rather than in a web request. The Ethical Hacker - Hardware is a specialized technical role focused on assessing embedded systems across all industries, from consumer IoT to industrial and connected devices. This role involves getting hands-on with a device, opening it up, and proving what an attacker with physical or local access can really do.
This role requires the rare combination of offensive security instinct and genuine hardware fundamentals. You will work directly with clients to understand their devices and deliver findings that improve security posture.
Something wrong with this posting?
Why us?