Skip to content
Esc
Internships in Canada
New-grad roles in Canada
Remote roles
Roles that show pay
Postings at high ghost risk
PayWhat student tech roles in Canada pay
Check a linkPaste a posting to see its real age and ghost risk
JobsEvery open tech role
CompaniesWho fills fastest, who leaves postings up
Hiring calendarWhen employers open intern and new-grad roles
Skills gapWhat postings ask for that you don't have
Your resumeScore and fixes
Your matchesOpen roles ranked by your resume
ApplicationsSaved, applied, interviewing, offers
SettingsTheme, text size, motion
How it works

↑ ↓ to move, Enter to open? every shortcut

Keyboard shortcuts

CtrlKor/
Search employers, postings and pages
JorK
Next or previous posting in a list
O
Open the posting's page
Enter
Open it in the preview, on wide screens
S
Save or unsave it
?
This list
Esc
Close
Human Computer Lab

Research Engineer

  • Seen live on Human Computer Lab's site yesterday
  • Mid level
  • Remote
Pay
Not stated
Location
Toronto
Open for
17+ days
First seen
Oct 18, 2026

Posting record

No flags

Open 17+ days

The posting's record, oldest first
  1. Human Computer Lab's site dates the posting
  2. Ghostless first sees this listing
  3. Last checked: still up
How we know

It hasn't been reposted, listed twice, or left up unusually long, and the posting doesn't say it's a talent pool.

Ghostless records the day it first sees a posting, so a repost can't reset its age. This one was already up when Ghostless started tracking Human Computer Lab, so its true age is longer.

Last checked Nov 3, 2026.

How well do you match?

See how much of this posting your resume shows, and what it's missing.

Upload your resume

What the posting discloses

Not stated: Pay, real vacancy, AI screening.

Why these three

Ontario requires postings from employers with 25 or more staff to state the pay, whether the vacancy exists, and whether AI screens applicants.

Some employers add pay only on their own site. Check the original posting before you rule it out.

Skills mentioned

About the role

Human Computer Lab is a research lab building character robots that feel alive and responsive. Our first robot, LeLamp, explores a new category of consumer robotics where everyday objects become interactive and help us reshape our attachment to technology.

Our goal is to push the frontier of human-robot interaction by making technology more legible, emotionally intuitive, and human-centered. We are building the foundation for a new generation of robots designed for everyday environments.

What to expect

We're looking for an inventor who builds. Someone who gets an unlikely idea on a weekend, tries it, watches it fail, notices something surprising in the wreckage, and follows that instead - all the way to a model, a dataset, a working robot, and a write-up anyone can reproduce. Research is the inventing half: finding the question nobody has asked, trying the unexpected method first, and building the evaluation that tells you the truth. Engineering is the making half: turning the idea into something that runs on a real robot, in a real home, fast enough that a person never notices the machinery. Most people are strong at one. This role is for the person who can't stop doing both. It isn't bound to one discipline - the problem might be expressive motion this month, sensing or thermals next quarter, an inference stack or a new robot body after that. You'll work directly with the CEO and founding team, with real room to explore, on problems that ship to people's homes.

In this role, you will

  • Pick open problems across the system - motion, perception, sensing, actuation, thermals, inference, tooling - and take them from first idea to working artifact.
  • Try the unlikely approach before the obvious one, kill it honestly when it fails, and use what the failure taught you.
  • Build the evaluation before you trust the result: the metric, the probe, and the side-by-side that catch what averages hide.
  • Create data where none exists - bootstrap it, synthesize it, curate it with taste - and know when synthetic data is misleading you.
  • Ship end to end: the model, the dataset, the firmware, the demo, and the robot in the room. Make it fast and reliable enough for everyday life.
  • Work across abstraction layers when the problem demands it — from a circuit or motor driver up to a trained model and the interaction on top of it.
  • Write up what you tried, what failed, what the numbers say, and what you'd do next, so someone else can reproduce it.
  • Use AI as a research collaborator - to map a search space, run experiments, and pressure-test your own ideas - and share your judgment in how you use it for novel approaches.

You may be a good fit if you

  • Have a body of self-directed work - projects, repositories, write-ups, videos, robots - that you started because you were curious, not because it was assigned. This matters more to us than any credential.
  • Have taken at least one idea from “what if” to a working, measured artifact, end to end.
  • Are fluent in Python and comfortable further down the stack - C/C++, embedded, or electronics — or have a record of learning a new layer when a problem required it.
  • Have trained, evaluated, and deployed ML models, and can reason about latency and compute on edge devices.
  • Have built real hardware - a robot, a device, an instrument, a sensor rig - from parts, not from a kit.
  • Can explain your failures as clearly as your successes.
  • Have a degree in engineering, computer science, physics, or a related field, or equivalent proof of work.
  • Have published research, open-source projects people actually use, or a public body of technical writing. A plus, not a requirement.

You will be a strong fit, if you

  • Can't stop doing both halves — inventing the method and building the thing — and get restless doing only one.
  • Choose problems as carefully as you solve them, and can tell an interesting question from a merely difficult one.
  • Report what you found, not what you hoped. You'd rather say “it passed these checks” than “it's solved.”
  • Have taste. You care whether something feels alive and reads right to a person, not only whether the loss went down.
  • Move fast without being sloppy, and leave every result reproducible.
  • Care about what technology does to people - not just what it can do and want your inventions to change how people relate to the machines in their lives.

The early team becomes the DNA of the company. We set ourselves and others to a high standard, and we respond with kindness when things get hard but keep everyone accountable. This requires us to be curious, creative, and diverse in our thinking and approach.

We’re proud to be an equal opportunity employer and consider all qualified applicants regardless of race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status. Even if you don’t meet every single requirement, we encourage you to apply. Studies show that women and underrepresented groups often hold back unless they meet 100% of the criteria - we don’t want that to be the reason we miss out on great talent.

Something wrong with this posting?